History of Cassette Tapes Part 2: The birth of the Compact Cassette Ultra Ferric

History of Cassette Tapes Part 2: The birth of the Compact Cassette

Introduction

The journey of recording media reached a significant milestone with the invention of the Compact Cassette tape. This format revolutionized how people recorded, stored, and consumed audio, making high-quality sound recording accessible and convenient for the masses.
In the previous chapter we covered the history of magnetic tapes. In part 2 of this series, we explore the technological predecessors of the Compact Cassette, the breakthroughs that led to its development, and a few derivatives that sprang from its success.

Figure 1 - The Compact Cassette Logo

Preceding Magnetic Tape Formats

Reel-to-Reel tapes

Before the arrival of the Compact Cassette, reel-to-reel tapes were the primary medium for high-quality audio recording. Introduced in the 1930s, reel-to-reel tapes used large spools of magnetic tape and provided superior sound quality compared to earlier mechanical technologies. These tapes were widely used in professional studios for music recording and in broadcasting due to their high fidelity and capacity for splicing and editing, which was invaluable for music production and radio.
However, despite its advantages, reel-to-reel tape had significant drawbacks for the average consumer. The equipment was bulky, expensive, and required technical expertise to operate. These factors limited its adoption to professionals and dedicated enthusiasts.

Pioneers like John T. Mullin, who brought back a Magnetophon recorder from Germany after World War II, played a crucial role in popularizing reel-to-reel tape in the United States. Mullin demonstrated the superior sound quality of magnetic tape to industry leaders like Bing Crosby, who invested in the technology for his radio shows. This endorsement helped establish reel-to-reel tape as a dominant medium in professional audio recording.

Figure 2 - (left to right) John T. Mullin, Frank Healey, Wayne Johnson, and Bing Crosby

8 Tracks

In the 1960s, the 8-track tape emerged as a more consumer-friendly format. Developed by a consortium led by William (Bill) T. Lear of Lear Jet Corporation, 8-tracks became popular for their portability and ease of use.

The 8-track cartridge contained a continuous loop of magnetic tape, divided into eight tracks (or four stereo pairs). This design allowed for uninterrupted playback without the need to rewind.

Figure 3 - Bill Lear, the inventor of 8-Tracks

8-tracks became especially popular for use in cars, where their ease of use and compact design were major advantages. Car manufacturers, including Ford, began offering 8-track players as optional equipment, contributing to the format's widespread adoption.

Figure 4 - Lear Jet HAS 940 8-Track stereo player

Despite their popularity, 8-tracks had several limitations. The continuous loop design led to issues with tape wear and alignment, the inability to rewind, and the relatively short playtime per track meant frequent interruptions during playback. Additionally, the audio quality, while good, was not nearly as good as that of reel-to-reel tapes or vinyl records.
These limitations eventually led to the decline of 8-tracks, making way for more versatile formats like the Compact Cassette that soon followed.

The Birth of the Compact Cassette

The limitations of reel-to-reel and 8-tracks set the stage for the development of a more convenient and user-friendly audio format. Enter the Compact Cassette.

In the early 1960s Philips Eindhoven tasked two different teams to design a tape cartridge for thinner and narrower tape compared to what was used in reel-to-reel tape recorders. By 1962, the Vienna division of Philips developed a single-hole cassette, adapted from its German described name Einloch-Kassette. It was never released to the public, and there is a truly fascinating thriller story behind it. You can read all about it inĀ Uwe H SĆ¼ltz's amazingĀ book "Compact Cassette REPORT".

Figure 5 -"Compact Cassette report", Uwe H SĆ¼ltz

However, Philips ended up selecting the two-spool cartridge as a winner and introduced the 2-track 2-direction mono version in Europe on 28 August 1963 at the Berlin Radio Show, and in the United States (under the Norelco brand) in November 1964. The trademark name Compact Cassette came a year later. The team of Dutch and Belgian origin at Philips was led by the Dutch Lou Ottens in Hasselt, Belgium.

Lou Ottens was driven by the vision of creating a cassette that was small enough to fit in a pocket and simple enough for anyone to use. Their goal was to make audio recording and playback accessible to the masses, moving away from the cumbersome and technically demanding reel-to-reel systems while avoiding the limitations and design flaws of the 8-Track cartridge.

Figure 6 - Lou Ottens (1926-2021), the inventor of the Compact Cassette

Ottens and his team designed the Compact Cassette with a protective plastic shell that housed a miniature reel-to-reel mechanism, simplifying the loading and unloading process and protecting the tape from dust and damage. This design made the cassettes highly portable and durable.

Figure 7 - Philips EL3300, the world's first Compact Cassette recorder

At the time, Philips was competing with Telefunken and Grundig that introduced their 'DC International' format in a race to establish its cassette tape as the worldwide standard, and it wanted support from Japanese electronics manufacturers. It turned out that one of the key factors in the success of the Compact Cassette was Philips' decision to license the technology freely, allowing other manufacturers to produce compatible tapes and players. This open licensing strategy led to rapid adoption and widespread availability, driving down costs and increasing consumer interest.

During the early days, the Compact Cassette was marketed primarily for dictation and personal recording. However, as the audio quality improved and more music was released on cassettes, the format gained popularity among music enthusiasts.Ā Its portability and ease of use made it an ideal medium for creating personalized mixtapes, a cultural phenomenon that became synonymous with the cassette era.

The mass production of blank Compact Cassettes began in 1964 in Hanover, Germany. Prerecorded music cassettes were launched in Europe in late 1965. The Mercury Record Company, a US affiliate of Philips, introduced prerecorded music cassettesĀ to the US in July 1966. Their initial offering consisted of 49 popular titles.
Interestingly enough, British record labels were late to the game and began releasing compact cassettes only in October 1967. Cassette tape sales exploded as a mass-market medium after the first "Walkman", the Sony TPS-L2, went on sale on July 1st, 1979.

The success of Compact Cassettes was rooted in several technical innovations. The tapes themselves were made of a durable polyester base film coated with magnetic particles, initially iron oxide and later chromium dioxide and other advanced formulations for improved sound quality. The cassette tape featured two miniature reels and a tape path that allowed for easy loading and playback without manual threading.

Compact Cassette players and recorders were designed to be simple to use. They later featured auto-reverse mechanisms, which allowed for continuous playback without the need to manually flip the tape, and high-fidelity recording capabilities.

The introduction of noise reduction technologies, such as Dolby B and later Dolby C, significantly improved the audio quality by reducing tape hiss and enhancing dynamic range.

* Sidenote: We will cover cassette formulations, notable players, noise reduction technologies, and the cultural impact of the Compact Cassettes in depth in the following articles of this series.

Compact Cassette Derivatives

As the Compact Cassette gained popularity, several derivative formats were developed to cater to specialized needs and applications. Among these variations are the Microcassette, Mini-Cassette, and Elcaset.

Microcassette

Introduced by Olympus in 1969, the Microcassette was similar to yet smaller than the standard Compact Cassette. Despite its smaller size and narrower tape, Microcassettes maintained reasonable audio quality due to it being a monophonic format that allowed for a larger section of the Ā tape to be utilized for each side. Microcassettes also offered extended recording times due to their slower tape speed.

Figure 8 - Sony M-909 and Olympus L400, world's smallest Microcassette recorders

The microcassette's compact size and versatility made it a popular choice for dictation machines and portable voice recorders, particularly in professional settings like journalism and law enforcement. Its ease of use and portability also made it a favorite for personal voice memos and dictation. It is the most successful of the Compact Cassette variants and its production continued for many years.

Mini-Cassette

The Mini-Cassette, developed by Philips in 1967, was similar in size to the microcassette but featured a slightly different tape path and mechanical design. It was also used mainly for dictation and voice recording. Although it did not achieve the same level of popularity as the microcassette, it found a niche in certain professional applications.

Figure 9 - Mini-Cassette (right) vs. Microcassette

Unlike the Compact Cassette, also designed by Philips, and the later Microcassette, introduced by Olympus, the Mini-Cassette does not use a capstan drive system; instead, the tape is propelled past the tape head by the reels. This is mechanically simple and allows the cassette to be made smaller and easier to use, but produces a system unsuited to any task other than voice recording, as the tape speed is not constant (averaging 2.4 cm/s) and prone to wow and flutter.

However, the lack of a capstan and a pinch roller drive means that the tape is well-suited to being repeatedly shuttled forward and backward short distances as compared to microcassettes, leading to the Mini-Cassette's use in the first generations of telephone answering machines, and continuing use in the niche markets of dictation and transcription, where fidelity is not critical, but robustness of storage is, and where analog media remained in use long after digital media had been introduced.

The Mini-Cassette's design focused on simplicity and reliability. Its limited market appeal and competition from other formats restricted its widespread adoption.

Elcaset

Elcaset was a short-lived audio format jointly developed by Sony, Panasonic, and Teac in 1976, building on an idea introduced 20 years earlier in the RCA tape cartridge.Ā At the time, most professionals believed that the Compact Cassette was never likely to be capable of the same levels of performance that was available from reel-to-reel systems, yet clearly the cassette had advantages in terms of convenience.

The name "Elcaset" means L-cassette, or large cassette, since the 1ā„4" tape inside is double the 1ā„8" width found in Compact Cassettes. The Elcaset system was intended to offer the best of both worlds. Ā The wider tape and the faster tape speed (3 Ā¾ Inch per second) promised performance that would rival the best reel-to-reel decks and the convenience of a Compact Cassette with a size that was a compromise between the two.

Figure 10 - Elcaset (left) vs. Compact Cassette

Despite its technical advantages, the Elcaset failed to gain widespread acceptance, primarily due to its high cost and the entrenched popularity of the Compact Cassette. The Elcaset was discontinued in the early 1980s, marking one of Sony's few missteps in the audio market.

Conclusion

The introduction of the Compact Cassette marked a significant advancement in the accessibility and convenience of high-quality audio recording and playback. Its invention not only fulfilled the need for a portable and easy-to-use format but also set the stage for the widespread personal consumption of media.

From its humble beginnings as a dictation device to its role as a cultural icon, the Compact Cassette revolutionized the way people recorded, stored, and consumed audio. Its derivatives, such as the Microcassette and Elcaset, further demonstrated the format's versatility and impact. Its portability and affordability democratized music recording and listening.

As we continue to explore the technology and legacy of Compact Cassettes, it remains a testament to the power of innovation and the enduring appeal of accessible, high-quality audio. Its influence can still be seen in today's digital recording technologies and the ongoing nostalgia for analog formats.

Credits

Figure 1: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Compact_cassette_logo.svg

Figure 2: https://www.vox.com/2016/5/16/11672678/tape-recording-70th-anniversary-jack-mullin

Figure 3: https://8trackheaven.com/the-8-track-story/8-track-history-lear/

Figure 4: https://discover.hubpages.com/technology/Lear-Jet-8-Track-Stereo-Player-Model-HSA-940

Figure 5:Ā https://amzn.to/3Vgs1pOĀ 

Figure 6:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lou_Ottens#/media/File:Ir._L.F._Ottens,_2007.jpg

Figure 7: https://www.philips.com/a-w/about/news/media-library/20190101-First-Philips-cassette-recorder-1963.html

Figure 8: https://www.just-cassette.com/post/sony_m909 and https://www.radiomuseum.org/r/olympus_pearlcorder_l400.html

Figure 9: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mini-Cassette#/media/File:Micro_mini_cassette.jpg

Figure 10: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/83/Elcaset_and_Compact_Cassette_size_comparison.jpg

Back to blog

4 comments

Iā€™m surprised Dolby HX Pro didnā€™t get a mention as it was standard on nearly all hi-fi cassette decks from the mid 1980s on and could give close to Type IV performance in terms of frequency response from a good Type I tape.

Dolby C gets a brief mention but Dolby S doesnā€™t. They were both so much more than just noise reduction as they used anti-saturation and spectral skewing techniques to vastly improve high frequency performance at high signal levels.

My not particularly expensive hi-fi deck from the 90s with Dolby HX Pro and Dolby C is flat within 1dB from 17Hz to 21kHz with a humble TDK FE Type I tape, so it was perfectly possible to achieve CD quality in terms of frequency response.

Dolby S (the domestic version of Dolby SR) migrated its way down to mid-tier decks in the mid 90s and blew the doors off what Dolby C had already achieved in terms of noise reduction and linearising magnetic tape behaviour.

I donā€™t expect anyone to include everything in a brief description of the format, but these were all major milestones along the journey that took a dictation machine up to the level where audiophiles struggled to tell it from compact disc.

Fred

Completely left out the Lear 4 track system. Predated and overlapped the introduction of 8 Track.

Eliot Matson

Excellent reporting that shows the worldwide efforts leading to the birth and evolution of the technology .

Ed Bukont

Excellent series! Thanks for sharing.
Looking forward to reading the following articles!

Jim Ratcliffe

Leave a comment